
In January 2026, UBS officially opened direct trading of Bitcoin and Ethereum to select private banking clients in Switzerland.
The world’s largest wealth manager, overseeing over $4.7 trillion in assets, had historically maintained a conservative stance toward cryptocurrencies. Former chairman Axel Weber publicly stated in late 2021, when Bitcoin hit an all-time high, that “anonymous payments will not survive.”
The shift was driven by client demand and competitive pressure. Morgan Stanley had already opened access to crypto funds for all its wealth management clients by the end of 2025, removing the prior restriction to high-net-worth clients with over $1.5 million in assets and high-risk tolerance. JPMorgan allows certain clients to use BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF as collateral for loans. Even the last stronghold against crypto, Vanguard, capitulated in December 2025, permitting clients to trade crypto ETFs.
UBS is currently vetting custody and execution partners, initially targeting a small group of private banking clients in Switzerland. Expansion into Asia-Pacific and the U.S. markets may follow.
UBS’s entry completes Switzerland’s banking crypto ecosystem. Approximately 20 Swiss banks now offer crypto services—more than any other country. The United States follows with 15, and Germany with 12.
This number reflects real user adoption. After ZKB and PostFinance launched their crypto services in 2024, they collectively provided crypto trading access to over 2.5 million Swiss bank accounts.
PostFinance, a systemically important state-owned bank in Switzerland, opened 36,000 crypto custody accounts in its first year and processed over 565,000 transactions—far beyond the scope of a pilot phase.
Peter Hubli, head of digital assets at ZKB, admitted during an interview with The Big Whale that banks had anticipated a younger demographic of crypto clients.
“This was probably the biggest surprise from this launch. Like many others, we assumed we’d attract a very young clientele—but it turned out to be completely different.”
In reality, ZKB’s crypto buyers are predominantly male, aged between 30 and 50, and concentrated in private banking rather than retail banking.
A more critical statistic: over 40% of ZKB’s crypto custody clients had no prior investment portfolio with the bank. Their cash had been idle in accounts. Crypto trading has unlocked a pool of “sleeping capital” that would otherwise generate zero asset management revenue.
Financial results from several Swiss banks confirm that crypto is no longer just a proof-of-concept:
Maerki Baumann derives over 20% of its bank profits from digital asset operations. Swissquote generates around 10% of its total revenue from crypto. Arab Bank Switzerland’s crypto assets represent only 5% of AUM but contribute 7% to net profit.
Though small in scale, the profit margin is disproportionately high. The unit economics of crypto services clearly outperform traditional banking activities.
Swiss banks’ moves align with broader institutional capital trends. In January 2026, EY-Parthenon and Coinbase surveyed over 350 institutional investors globally, including asset managers, family offices, and private banks. 73% plan to increase crypto allocations in 2026, and 84% have already adopted or are actively exploring stablecoins.
Custody security and regulatory clarity remain the top two concerns for institutional investors. Switzerland holds a first-mover advantage in both dimensions: the Distributed Ledger Technology Act (DLT Act), enacted in 2021, provides a legal framework, while bank-grade custodians like Taurus and Sygnum offer robust infrastructure. Switzerland’s banking crypto integration is essentially a regional manifestation of the global institutional onboarding trend.
The OECD’s Cryptocurrency Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) will take effect on January 1, 2027, ending the era of tax opacity for crypto assets. The public consultation on FINMA’s licensing reform concluded in February 2026, redefining rules for custody and stablecoins, with some provisions aligned with the European MiCA framework.
Ilya Volkov, board member of the Crypto Valley Association, warned that excessive “regulatory micromanagement” could erode Switzerland’s long-standing pragmatic advantage.
Author: Jakub Dziadkowiec, Translated by: Deep Tide TechFlow
Disclaimer: Contains third-party opinions, does not constitute financial advice
Upexi's financial report reveals third-quarter net loss widened to $109 million, with stock dropping over 8%
2 mins ago
Analysts: Altcoin shows signs of recovery, but it's still too early to declare the "Altseason" underway
4 mins ago
CZ's New Interview: 76 Days in Prison, a Pardon Letter, Yet I Still Dedicate 80% of My Energy to Blockchain
6 mins ago
From a Solana Devotee to a Hyperliquid Enthusiast: Why I’ve Now Gone All-In on a New Direction?
18 mins ago
Hong Kong stock market AI-related concepts continue to rise, with Zhipu surging over 29%
21 mins ago
Space Dog ASTEROID: A Tale of Rise and Fall — Solana Continues Breaking New Highs, Can Early Ethereum Community Donations of $100 Support a $120M Valuation?
31 mins ago
KULR Technology transfers 300 BTC to Coinbase Prime, with an unrealized loss of approximately $18.25 million on paper
31 mins ago






